Economic Bombshell!

As the economy goes, so goes presidential elections…

So, its a bombshell when, right before the election, the Trump economy roars back at a pace never seen before since US economic activity has been recorded:

“Following a record downturn, the U.S. economy expanded by 7.4 percent over the prior quarter and at a 33.1 percent annual rate, posting the strongest recovery in recorded history.” (source)

And, just in case someone is unclear, or wants to wishfully attribute this to the Obama Administration:

“Here’s the reality check. Under President Barack Obama, the economy barely grew 2 percent—rather pathetic for a “recovery.” The people who made the preposterous bullish claims that Obama saved the economy are the ones who now say the Biden economic plan will gain millions of jobs.

In the last year of Obama’s presidency, growth shrunk to 1.6 percent, and the concern was the possibility of another recession. That’s some boom.” (source)

More Dishonest and Jealous Attacks on Trump and His Successes

The Mainstream ‘Media’ and Leftists everywhere continue to try and make their own fevered conjectures into objective reality in their attacks against Trump and his administration. The assertion that Trump is an emergent Hitler-ite due to his support of America first, and rejection of Leftist anti-leadership, is just one element of that dishonest debate:

What is nationalism? The word is suddenly and surprisingly important when talking about the times we live in. But we seem to be working without a shared definition.

“You know what I am? I’m a nationalist,” Donald Trump said in an October rally in Houston.

French president Emmanuel Macron slapped back at a commemoration ceremony for World War I in France. “Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism,” he said. “By saying ‘our interests first, who cares about the others,’ we erase what a nation holds dearest, what gives it life, what makes it great and what is essential: its moral values.” [article link]

Nationalism does not equal Hitler 

Honestly, the whole debate seems to be various actors looking for ways to torture word-definitions to force Trump into the box they wish he was in, but is not: a Fascist.

For Trump, Nationalism equals “Make America Great Again” plain and simple. Nationalism also equals Patriotism. Both are the natural and non-bogeyman words used by regular people that have pride in their country. It does not mean the rise of the fourth Reich.

Fascism, on the other hand, is a word without ambiguity when describing a dangerous actor. It describes an entity that has ambitions to offer violence and/or expand its national boundaries, or do extra-national expeditionary activities.

Fascism (noun)
fas·​cism | \ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi- zəm\

Definition of Fascism
1 : often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control

Imperialism is another term that is similar to fascism, but not Nationalism:

Imperialism (noun)
im·​pe·​ri·​al·​ism | \im-ˈpir-ē-ə-ˌli-zəm \
Definition of imperialism
1 : imperial government, authority, or system
2 : the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas
broadly : the extension or imposition of power, authority, or influence

So if Trump had said ‘I am a Fascist’ or ‘Imperialist,’ then there would not be any confusion on his intent. Beyond that, his opponents are reaching (and projecting).

Why Europe and Leftists will struggle in the near-term

Macron is a philosophically lost individual in a role that requires ethical understanding and wisdom. He gets it completely wrong in his quote above. That’s backed up by looking up the dictionary definition of the word, not what he wants it to mean to back his small-nation/small-leader jealousy of Trump’s successes thus far.

Nationalism (noun)
na·​tion·​al·​ism | \ˈnash-nə-ˌli-zəm, ˈna-shə-nə-ˌli-zəm\

Definition of Nationalism
1 : loyalty and devotion to a nation
especially : a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups
2 : a nationalist movement or government

As a leader (vs. a politician), Macron is a total fail like the Left and Democrat party in the US these days. Has anyone told him, by the way, he is the leader of the country of France? His passport does not say milquetoast ‘citizen’ of the world, or toady of the faceless and unaccountable, bureaucratic EU beast that lurks in Brussels. It says “French” for nationality. He is leader and a member of team France. Trump gets this pretty basic and commonsense concept, but Macron does not.

Imagine if he were a business CEO that was for every competitor or other company not as big as his out of ‘compassion’ or other asinine reason? Imagine if he were the coach of a sports team that was really more concerned about every team but his? He would utterly fail in any real-world scenario that required him to lead a group to produce an objective outcome. This incompetency is what is driving the growing success of ‘evil’ and ‘bigoted’ nationalist groups/parties in Europe. People are demanding that their political representatives do their fundamental job and look out for their country’s interests. Nationalist/patriotic-driven political groups are the only ones that seem to offer or understand that today.

Europe’s day of Trumpian upset of the current political order is just around the corner.

Prediction: Pipe Bomb/Powder Culprit is a Democrat

Does anyone seriously think that this is real? At the 11th hour before the mid-terms that look to be shaping up into a carbon-copy of the conditions that got President Trump elected, a right-wing extremist person or group (allegedly) goes after Democrat political representatives and supporters with bombs and suspect powders?!

The timing and execution is so suspect, that it can only be a (yet again) manufactured crisis of the Left. When Leftists immersed in the race-obsessed studies and corrosive attitudes at today’s major colleges/universities keep getting disappointed waiting for the racist outbursts they know lurk in the heart of every non-Leftist, they end up having to manufacture them to make their point.

The relevant analysis here aligns with what the FBI says in its investigation of this incident: “Who stands to gain from this?”

Why Its Not Someone from some Right-wing Group

Timing

• The timing of this only makes sense for someone that wants to play the victim of the violence-game scenario from unnamed, but nefarious forces in our society. The only ones out there advocating violence against individuals for differing political beliefs were the Democrats (Holder, Clinton, Maxine Waters, Antifa, Black Lives Matter, etc.).
• The only ones that gain from this timing are the Democrats. Somebody must have realized and their current authoritarian-thug trend was hurting them in the polls. If they were right-wing extremists, this did what, for them and their cause? Nothing.

Targets

• Who was it sent to? Initial list: Former Presidents Obama & Bill Clinton, former Vice President Joe Biden, failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, former CIA Director John Brennan (at CNN), former Attorney General Eric Holder, Robert De Niro’s film and production company. Most of the return addresses were apparently to the office of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.
• How many of the above people are running for their seat in the mid-terms? It looks like a list made up by a left-wing operative that sees a left-wing world and players, and not the ‘white supremacists of America’ or something similar. They would have targeted the people running for office.

Competence

• How many bombs went off? None. How many packets of powder were bio-weapons? None. Tactically, this was a total-fail on every aspect of the ‘plan’.
• Who would do this? A Leftist/Democrat group that wanted to make a pretend scenario to help get themselves in the public eye so they could go back to playing their favored victim role, but not actually hurt anyone (lest they get caught).

So what will likely and eventually come out on this will be a clumsy Leftist/Democrat group that tried to create the scenario they think is true, and want the world to see, but that does not tie into any reality or actual threat that might exist. All they will do is further degrade the credibility of their party in both the short and long term politically.

 

 

 

 

Failing the Temptation of the Democrat Quotas and Spoils System

You’re a Democrat. Your party has grown and derived evermore of its core power and influence from a racial grievances, quotas, and spoils system. But you are a white Democrat, so other Democrats tell you that’s something you should be ashamed of. The temptation to steal some of that power and privilege for yourself from your party’s racial set-asides cookie-jar is great. Too great, in fact for a growing number of otherwise average white people to resist. The lengths that some of these people have gone to do this ranges from the bizarre to just plain opportunistic and unethical.

See this current event in the LeadUSA MindMap >>

Analysis:

Enter Elizabeth Warren. She looked in the mirror. She had prominent cheekbones. No, make that high cheekbones. Indians have high cheekbones. Ergo- Warren is an Indian! This also means all white people- nay, all people- with high cheekbones are also Indians!

Warren was listed as Native American in the Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania law faculty directories. Does anyone not think that created an advantage for her when she later went to get a job? Or get into politics?

Then, several people of actual Native American descent sent her DNA tests to put the allegation of lying about her heritage for personal advantage to bed. What did she do? She sent the kits back and stated “I know who I am.” (Source)

The best anyone has hazarded an actual figure for Warren’s heritage is 1/32 Native American, and then recanted on that. The Washington Post’s “Fact Checker” page has actually decided against judging the issue at all, offering “no rating”  (Source)

When CNN can’t even come up with a fig leaf for a leading far-Left Democrat, she is on shaky ground. When you refuse the most easy and basic test to clear your name, that is proof positive that she is a liar.

This is what ACTUAL cultural appropriation looks like!

Read this multi-dimensional article in the LeadUSA MindMap >>

List of Racial Shysters: Shyster #1 Elizabeth Warren

 

Communist China Announces Intent to Remove Term Limits on Presidency

On February 25th, 2018, a step backwards was made by Communist President Xi and the Chinese Congress to dismantle their constitution and the progress made in the 80’s to move from dictatorial Maoism towards a representative government:

“The Communist Party of China Central Committee proposed to remove the expression that the President and Vice-President of the People’s Republic of China “shall serve no more than two consecutive terms” from the country’s Constitution.

The proposal was made public Sunday. ” (Announced on XinhuaNet)

The extent of the move back to a cult of personality goes deeper than just this action. It includes an amendment to insert Xi’s political philosophy, bearing his name, into the Chinese constitution. This has been done only two times before, the foremost figure being Mao Tse Tung.

“The ceremonial legislature, the National People’s Congress, prepares to amend China’s constitution to remove the previous limit of two consecutive five-year terms from the presidency and vice presidency. The amendment also calls for inserting Xi’s personal political philosophy into the preamble of the national constitution. With the changes expected to pass near unanimously, nothing appears to now stand between Xi and remaining China’s top leader indefinitely.” (Source)

See this Current Event in the LeadUSA MindMap >> 

 

 

This also is related to the MacroTrend of a “Rise of Tyranny on the World Stage” in the LeadUSA MindMap >>

 

 

Rise of Tyranny on the World Stage

First Russia:

“[President] Putin… did not change Russia’s constitution but maneuvered around it by installing a loyal ally in Dmitry Medvedev to serve as president for one term, while he retained the real power as the country’s prime minister — before returning in 2012 for a third term as president.” (Source)

…and now China have taken steps to move back toward dictatorships and bypass/dismantle political limits on time in key leadership roles:

“…[President] Xi places considerable stress on the law as a justification for, and tool of, Communist Party rule. “No organization or individual has the power to overstep the constitution or the law,” he told a meeting of the party’s central leadership on Saturday. In other words, if Xi stays, the constitution has to reflect that.” (Source)

Both Russia and China are powers hostile to the US. These changes are a net negative for the US and freedom in general across the world stage.

See this MacroTrend in the LeadUSA MindMap >>

Think You Know Trump?

Beyond all the hype and disinformation, here is a brief insight into the actual, recorded words of the man elected to the Presidency of the United States in 2016.

As a leader ACTUALLY doing what he said he would do, take 5 minutes and see the accuracy with which he accessed the social/political landscape, and see where he is taking us:

And if you got through the whole speech, could you see Obama, Hillary, or any Democrat thinking this, let alone extolling these pro-American views?

Trump is looking out for our country in the way you would expect the highest leader to do so- not apologizing for it, and/or trying to unravel it for personal gain or to curry favor with others.

Trump to Meet with Kim Jong Un

On March 6th, 2018 it was announced that
dictator Kim Jong Un reached out for a meeting with President Trump via South Korean intermediaries. The initial focus of discussions would ostensibly be on the de-nuclearization of North Korea.

See this current event in the LeadUSA MindMap >> 

Initial Analysis:

• North Korea is a bad actor that has periodically made waves on the international stage to maintain relevance, but mostly to negotiate or make bad-faith promises to gullible Western powers in exchange for money, fuel, food, or other critical resources that the dictatorship needs to prop up its failed state and poor economy. This bad diplomatic trend began with Bill Clinton’s administration (the failed 1994 Agreed Framework) and has been repeatedly used by North Korea over the past 2 decades. Its most likely that Kim Jong Un will try this same pattern again with Trump.
• This current event is considered initially positive as Trump is a realist that will not make empty or ineffective agreements with North Korean that will hurt the security of the US for personal political legacies like Obama’s disastrous Iran ‘deal’.

Read this multi-dimensional article in the LeadUSA MindMap >>

An Officer was on the Scene during the Shooting and did Nothing

This update is tied to the topic of a society that has the will to resist.

If we cultivate a weak, dependent society that waits for other to act, then we are a declining country. An example of this surfaced in the recent reporting on the Parkland school shooting:

“[Florida Deputy Scot] Peterson was near the shooting site for four minutes of Cruz’s six minute rampage. But instead of the armed, trained officer engaging Cruz — something that could have saved several lives — Peterson remained outside, taking shelter behind a concrete barrier, according to authorities who viewed surveillance film.” (Source)

America was founded on the idea of a dynamic, self-sufficient citizenry. This is enshrined in our founding documents around the primacy of the individual and individual rights. If we find and/or train these dynamic, self-sufficient people to be among us, we will win the fight against this sort of violence and horrific societal trend. If we stand around like dependents and cowards, live are lost and this evil spreads.

Click on this picture icon to see/read this point and other linked/clustered info in the Parkland School Shooting Multi-Dimensional Article:

CNN Actor in Gun Control Debate Instead of News Organization

CNN continues to be a political actor in current events vs. being a neutral news organization reporting what others do. They face charges of providing scripted answers to attendees of the ‘townhall’ they hosted with a crowd of emotional teenage students from Parkland FL, community members, as well as various FL lawmakers, law enforcement, and a spokesperson from the NRA.

Colton Haab, a potential attendee from Douglas HS told a local Florida TV station he declined to appear at the network’s town hall on gun violence, because CNN wanted him to read a scripted question. He said CNN rejected his proposed question/solution on having armed military veterans protect schools as a discussion point.

CNN insists it did not provide or give scripted questions/responses to any of the participants at Wednesday night’s televised town hall at the BB&T Center.

The event was attended by Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Bill Nelson, Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel, and NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch.

Click on this picture icon to see/read this point and other linked/clustered info in the Parkland School Shooting Multi-Dimensional Article: